Facebook
Business without legal barriers

In the course of business activities, various disputes constantly arise. The difficulty in resolving these disputes is due to both the complex legislative framework governing economic relations and the need to consider the specifics of the business component of the economic dispute, as almost every such dispute, apart from purely legal issues, involves corresponding economic interests.

Economic disputes are highly diverse in nature, ranging from non-payment by a buyer for delivered goods or the supply of substandard products to unfair competition or violations of intellectual property rights. To successfully resolve such disputes, it is necessary not only to have experience in litigation but also to possess specialized knowledge in the respective field, depending on the type of specific dispute. For example, in disputes with dishonest carriers, theoretical knowledge and practical experience in transport law are required, while in disputes with an insurance company, expertise in insurance law is needed. These factors necessitate consulting with lawyers who specialize in resolving economic disputes.

The lawyers of the “WinnerLex” law firm have many years of successful experience in resolving economic disputes, including the following categories:

  • Disputes over the recovery of debts and damages, the imposition of fines, and administrative-economic sanctions;
  • Disputes regarding the conclusion, modification, termination, and execution of contracts, as well as the recognition of contracts as invalid;
  • Disputes regarding the recognition of ownership rights or other property rights to movable and immovable property, registration of property rights;
  • Disputes with insurance companies and carriers;
  • Disputes in the field of construction, regarding the rental or leasing of property;
  • Disputes over violations of copyright and related rights;
  • Cases related to protection from unfair competition;
  • Cases related to business reputation protection;
  • Economic disputes involving non-residents;
  • Bankruptcy procedures.
The specialists:
prev
next
Our Advantages:
SPECIALIZATION One of the main areas of activity of the "WinnerLex" law firm is resolving economic disputes, as our team's goal is to create conditions for running your business without legal barriers.
EXPERIENCE The team at "WinnerLex" has extensive experience successfully resolving a large number of economic disputes of various categories and complexity levels.
PROACTIVITY We anticipate possible threats and protect against potential risks.
COMPETENCE By monitoring current changes in the legislation governing business activity and reviewing the latest judicial practices in economic courts, combined with our accumulated experience in supporting economic disputes, we apply a comprehensive and always up-to-date approach when resolving economic disputes.
PROFESSIONALISM Our specialists have many years of experience in providing legal support to medium and large businesses, so we understand your needs better than anyone else and have sufficient experience to successfully resolve even the most complex legal issues of our clients.
OPERATIONALITY "Quick legal assistance" in case of any legal problems.
Lawyer's Advice
prev
next
Frequently Asked Questions
In which economic court should a claim be filed?

As a general rule, a claim should be filed in the economic court at the location of the defendant. However, there are several exceptions to this rule. For example, disputes related to immovable property are considered by the economic court at the location of the property or its main part. Claims for damages caused to property can be filed at the location where the damage occurred.

Does the plaintiff have the right to file a claim in an economic court if the contract states that disputes should be resolved in an arbitration court?

Even if the contract contains an arbitration clause, the plaintiff may still file a claim in the economic court. However, if the defendant objects to resolving the dispute in the economic court before the trial begins, the court will dismiss the claim unless it recognizes the arbitration agreement as invalid, expired, or unenforceable.

Can a penalty be collected from a debtor who has delayed payment if the penalty is not specified in the contract?

The application of penalties is a contractual sanction, which requires mutual agreement of the parties. Therefore, if the contract does not specify the penalty, it is impossible to collect it from a debtor who has delayed payment. In this case, the debtor should be required to pay 3% annual interest for the use of another party’s money and compensation for inflation losses.

Additional services
thanks