The suspension of tax invoices and the non-acceptance of the table can also occur due to reasons such as low tax burden, non-compliance with expense standards for risky goods (fuel, fertilizers, etc.), insufficient equipment or human resources, cooperation with risky counterparties, and so on.
In our opinion, the most common factors for refusal to register tax invoices for producers are:
- Lack of documentary evidence of the equipment used for planting and harvesting;
- Missing reports: 4-SG (annual) “Report on the Sown Areas of Agricultural Crops,” 37-SG (as of the last reporting date of submission) “Report on Sowing and Harvesting Agricultural Crops, and Other Field Work,” 24-SG (monthly, annual) “Report on the Production of Animal Products and the Number of Livestock,” 29-SG (annual) “Report on the Areas and Gross Yields of Agricultural Crops, Fruits, Berries, and Grapes”;
- Failure to submit a tax declaration for land tax;
- Failure to submit a tax declaration for a single tax payer (Group 4);
- Failure to provide information on land plots;
- Inconsistency between the amount of grain sold and the ability to produce it;
- Lack of fixed assets;
- Insufficient number of employees;
- Failure to submit the 20-OPP report (on the presence of owned and/or leased vehicles);
- Failure to submit the taxpayer data table;
- The counterparty has not declared its relationship with the agricultural producer;
- The counterparty is listed as a risky taxpayer;
- Failure to submit a notification regarding explanations and copies of documents related to the tax invoices whose registration has been suspended;
- The explanation does not describe the full cycle of operations of the agricultural producer and/or does not provide sufficient documentation to support it.
The question arises: how should we proceed?
There is a well-established action algorithm in case of tax invoice registration suspension, which consists of the following stages:
1. Preparation and submission of explanations and copies of documents to the controlling authority.
It is important to understand that although the Order on Decision-Making for the Registration/Refusal of Registration of Tax Invoices/Correction Calculations in the Unified Register of Tax Invoices, approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine Order No. 520 of December 12, 2019, defines the taxpayer’s right, not the obligation, to submit documents necessary for the decision on the registration of a tax invoice/correction calculation in the ERPN, based on our practice, providing well-grounded explanations and quality documents significantly increases the chances of registering the tax invoice/correction calculation in the ERPN.
In the explanations, it is crucial to state that your company does not meet the risk criteria for either the VAT payer or the transaction operations, based on the actual business activities, which can be confirmed, in particular, by contracts, specifications, invoices, acts of completed work (services provided), payment orders, presence of fixed assets (sale and purchase agreements, lease agreements), and human resources (1-DF, civil law contracts), etc.
Result: We either receive a decision to register the tax invoice, or we receive a decision to refuse registration of the tax invoice.
2. Preparation and submission of a complaint to the controlling authority regarding the decision to refuse the registration of a tax invoice.
As a rule, the decision to refuse the registration of tax invoices/correction calculations in the Unified Register of Tax Invoices does not include a list of documents that, according to the controlling authority, were not provided by the taxpayer. In particular, the following reasons for refusal are often stated for agricultural producers:
- “Failure to provide the taxpayer with copies of documents: settlement documents and/or bank statements from personal accounts.”
- “Failure to provide the taxpayer with copies of documents: primary documents regarding the supply/purchase of goods/services, storage and transportation, loading, unloading of products, warehouse documents (inventory descriptions), including invoices/invoices, acceptance-transfer acts for goods (works, services) taking into account the presence of certain typical forms and industry-specific features, delivery notes.”
It should be noted that according to the rules of the Procedure for the Suspension of the Registration of Tax Invoices/Correction Calculations in the Unified Register of Tax Invoices, approved by the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated December 11, 2019, No. 1165, the condition for unblocking the registration of tax invoices is the provision by the taxpayer of the necessary documents to the controlling authority for making a decision on the registration of tax invoices.
That is, it is the responsibility of the controlling authority to provide the taxpayer with a comprehensive list of documents that must be submitted. This has been repeatedly confirmed in judicial practice, for example, in the Supreme Court rulings of February 18, 2020, in case No. 360/1776/19, October 23, 2018, in case No. 822/1817/18, May 21, 2019, in case No. 0940/1240/18, and July 22, 2019, in case No. 815/2985/18.
However, as a rule, the decision to refuse the registration of tax invoices/correction calculations in the ERPN does not contain either a list of documents not provided or, even more, their specification. Therefore, it is essential to take into account the specifics of the agricultural business and provide the relevant documents, including 20-OPP reports, 4-SG reports, 37-SG, 24-SG, and 29-SG reports, tax declarations for land tax, information about land plots, and so on.
Thus, thorough preparation at this stage and submission of a well-prepared complaint is a very effective way to protect your interests. We also have examples of such complaints being satisfied, one of which you can review via this link.
Result: We either receive a decision to satisfy the complaint or a decision to refuse to satisfy the complaint.
3. Preparation and submission of a claim to court.
It is important to note that when preparing and submitting a claim to court, adhering to procedural deadlines is crucial.
For submitting such claims, the following deadlines are established:
- 6 months from the day the person learned or should have learned about the violation of their rights, freedoms, or interests, or
- 3 months from the day the plaintiff received the decision regarding the consideration of their complaint about the decision, actions, or inaction of the authority, if the law provides for the possibility of pre-trial dispute resolution and the plaintiff used this procedure, or if the law requires pre-trial dispute resolution.
The second important point is that when submitting a claim to court, you must provide the most complete set of documents related to the business activities of your company. This includes not only the blocked invoice but also the possibility of conducting such activities in general. The list of documents that can confirm the reality of business operations for agricultural producers was described earlier.
It is important to remember that all evidence must be submitted simultaneously with the claim. If submitted later, you need to prove the objective impossibility of presenting it to the court earlier. Otherwise, the court will not accept the late-submitted documents as evidence and will make its decision without considering them.
Additionally, the claim must be structured and include a chronological list of events, including the submission of explanations to the controlling authority, receipt of the corresponding decision, submission of a complaint, and receipt of a decision based on its consideration.
It is also important to note that in the claim, along with requests for the cancellation of the decision and the obligation to register the tax invoices in the ERPN, you can ask for the cancellation of the decision and the obligation to remove the company from the list of taxpayers who meet the risk criteria. That is, if your company is included in the list of risky companies according to paragraph 8 of the Risk Criteria for a taxpayer, and you cannot remove this risk status in the pre-trial procedure, the analysis of recent court practice shows that courts satisfy such requests. An example of this is the ruling of the Supreme Court on February 18, 2020, in case No. 360/1776/19, the ruling of the Eighth Appellate Administrative Court on October 13, 2020, in case No. A/857/8653/20, and the ruling of the Fifth Appellate Administrative Court on October 7, 2020, in case No. 420/4666/20.
Therefore, summarizing the above, we consider it necessary to provide the following recommendations to agricultural producers:
- Approach the selection of counterparties responsibly. Today, there are resources where you can check the history of the company you plan to work with, as well as identify potential risks of cooperation with that company.
- Do not neglect the documentary formalization of business transactions. The sale of products grown by agricultural producers requires carrying out a number of important and mandatory business operations. Each transaction must be confirmed by all necessary documents, which must be properly executed in accordance with current legislation.
- Do not be afraid to communicate with the controlling authorities. In certain areas, hotlines have been established where farmers can receive advice on current issues related to tax invoice registration. In addition, you can schedule an appointment with the relevant officials of the controlling authority, where you can get the information you are concerned about.
- Most importantly, the key to the effectiveness of passing through the stages of unblocking tax invoices is always the quality preparation of explanations and data tables, complaints, claims, and supporting documents. Quite often, if quality explanations and documents are prepared, the tax authority registers the previously suspended tax invoices at the first stage.
However, in a significant number of cases, when the tax authority still leaves the block in place, the only way to cancel the blockage is by going to court.
The prospects of winning a lawsuit are better if the entire unblocking process is accompanied from the very beginning by a tax dispute lawyer who will properly justify the taxpayer’s position and gather all the documents during the pre-trial stage of problem resolution, thus preparing a position that will help win the possible court case.
After all, during the preparation of the claim and the court process, it can sometimes be quite difficult, or even impossible, to correct mistakes made during the stage of explanations or administrative appeals regarding the blocking.
To end on a positive note, it should be noted that according to our personal experience, as well as general statistics, courts often side with taxpayers in disputes over the appeal of blocked tax invoices.